GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE INDEX
Many
sustainability reporting metrics/standards are being used throughout the world
today. However, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) index is one of the
oldest and most widely used one. GRI is affiliated with the biggest
organizations such as OECD, UNEP, United Nations Global Compact and ISO.
Initially, GRI has evolved its reporting format from a “one- size -fits-all”
model to developed “sector-specific” supplements that provide more appropriate
indicators for sectors such as mining, car manufacturing, financial services,
and tour operators.
Through
time, international organizations such as the Institute of Chemical Engineers
(IChemE) have also used the general GRI framework to draft their reporting
formats. The GRI has helped them come up with progress report format that will
assess the performance of the processing sector by assessing the impacts of
their activities on the triple bottom line.
But,
like the many other reporting standards, GRI index has been criticized of being
inefficient because of the following reasons:
- It allows companies decide what to include in their reports ( completeness, relevance, and context ).: Most companies decide not to include the performance of companies in their supply chain as they consider it off bounds.
- It being universally accepted is helping companies to continue to use reporting as an opportunity for public relations spin rather than a serious effort at measuring and improving performance.
- Self- composed reporting format of GRI gives way to inaccurate / false reporting merely for protecting the company’s reputation from unexpected social and environmental violations
- While GRI pushes for more reporting, they have done little to increase or even assess the impact of existing sustainability reports. No usable or actionable reporting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Reporting_Initiative
Yes, many 2015 DBS graduates used GRI as the basis for their thesis research. It seems like a very aggressive undertaking for a company, with many flaws. I look forward to discussing this in class tomorrow!
ReplyDelete